What is a potential consequence of not testing a sub-process independently?

Testing a sub-process independently is crucial for evaluating its functionality and reliability in isolation before it is integrated into the parent process. When a sub-process is not tested independently, there is a risk of data conflicts arising due to unforeseen interactions with the parent process or dependencies on shared data. These conflicts can lead to incorrect data being processed, resulting in errors or unexpected behavior in the overall application.

By conducting independent testing, developers can identify issues related to data handling, variable scope, and dependencies that may not be evident when the sub-process is executed as part of the larger workflow. This careful approach helps in ensuring that when the sub-process is invoked by the parent process, it operates as intended without introducing discrepancies or complications that could affect the application's performance or outcomes.

In contrast, executing a parent process faster, additional logging, or ensuring better integration are not direct consequences of not testing a sub-process independently. These points focus on different aspects of process performance and monitoring rather than the critical issue of data integrity and operational correctness. Thus, the best explanation of the potential consequence centers on the risks of data conflict when the sub-process is not adequately tested in isolation.